Democrat Rep. Speier Wants States Banning Abortions To Force ‘Impregnator’ To Pay $350,000 ‘Bond’

Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D-CA), in an interview with CNN’s Jim Acosta, condemned the Supreme Court docket’s current resolution to overturn Roe v. Wade and urged that states banning abortion ought to drive the “impregnator” to submit a $350,000 “bond” to assist care for the kid.

Speier, who shared her private story of abortion on the Home ground in a 2011 speech, was proven a clip of that second throughout an interview with Acosta on Sunday.

“I understand the posh, frankly, that I had,” to have an abortion on the time she defined, noting that luxurious was “taken away from girls at this time throughout this nation.”

Speier went on to precise settlement with fellow Consultant Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who suggested Supreme Court docket Justices must be impeached as a result of they “lied underneath oath.”

“There’s no query they lied and so they did that underneath oath. So there needs to be penalties,” she concurred.

That’s when issues turned very, very unusual.

On the #StopTheBans rally, Rep. Jackie Speier says she is just not ashamed of her second-trimester abortion, that she had for medical causes, and criticized male state lawmakers for pondering “it’s alright to ship girls to jail or give them the loss of life penalty for having an abortion.” pic.twitter.com/mJLaNBFW8t

— Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) May 21, 2019

RELATED: Justice Alito’s Opinion Doesn’t Just Overturn Roe v. Wade, It Shreds It to Pieces

Jackie Speier: Power ‘Impregnator’ to Pay a Bond

In one of many extra absurd responses to the abortion ruling by the Supreme Court docket, Consultant Jackie Speier tossed out a suggestion that state legislatures take up payments that may drive the “impregnator” to submit a $350,000 bond to assist take care of the kid.

“For all these states now saying a girl can’t get an abortion, I’d recommend their legislatures require the impregnators to place up a $350,000 bond so a mom can care for that youngster,” she instructed Acosta.

Speier seems to, like many in her celebration, wrestle to know how intercourse works and that it takes two folks to create life by being pregnant. She additionally appears to be a bit ignorant on the state of the economic system and the quantity of people that have $350,000 of their financial institution accounts.

In accordance with Open Secrets and techniques, Speier has a net worth of over $11 million. 

ICYMI: Dem. Rep. Jackie Speier gave us this response to Roe being overturned: “For all these states now saying a girl can’t get an abortion, I’d recommend their legislatures require the impregnators to place up a $350,000 bond so a mom can care for that youngster.” pic.twitter.com/Q3rmaUg0A0

— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) June 26, 2022

Speier has made previous arguments during which she focuses on the “impregnator” in terms of abortion.

She warned in December because the case was being heard within the Supreme Court docket, “I believe the nation hasn’t seen the fashion of ladies talking out.”

She stated pro-life laws are “meant to be misogynistic” and say nothing in regards to the “duty of the impregnator.”

He needs to be topic to a DNA take a look at &required to submit a $300,000 bond for the kid SCOTUS & reactionary legislatures recommend is nothing greater than immaculate conception. The identical individuals who don’t need masks mandates imposed on their our bodies are able to take management of our uteruses.

— Jackie Speier (@RepSpeier) May 3, 2022

RELATED: Gun Rights Victory: Supreme Court Tosses New York Law Restricting Concealed Carry

Made the Argument Earlier than

Simply final month, Jackie Speier stated the ‘impregnator’ ought to submit a $300,000 bond and cited masks mandates when arguing the federal government shouldn’t have management of ladies’s our bodies.

“He needs to be topic to a DNA take a look at [and] required to submit a $300,000 bond for the kid,” she tweeted, suggesting the Supreme Court docket believes pregnancies are a results of “immaculate conception.”

“The identical individuals who don’t need masks mandates imposed on their our bodies are able to take management of our uteruses,” she added.

Speier’s response to the abortion case is much like that of Consultant Cori Bush, who likewise needed to deal with the ‘impregnator.’

In that case, Bush (D-MO) needed to know why Congress hadn’t been taking over “sperm regulation laws.”

“You realize, there’s a purpose why we don’t see sperm regulation laws,” Bush stated in an interview with MSNBC’s Pleasure Reid. “There’s a purpose why we don’t see mandated vasectomies.”

“You realize, the very concept that we might take away males’s bodily autonomy is outrageous, like, it’s unfathomable,” she added.

“However in truth sperm are busy. It’s busy. Who’s regulating that? Who’s saying one thing about it? … The place is that laws?”

Speier, in the meantime, has argued that abortion is such a ‘luxurious’ in at this time’s world that it quantities to little a couple of having their wisdom teeth extracted.

It is a Congresswoman of us!

Rep. Jackie Speier believes abortions are “safer than a knowledge enamel extraction”

Abortion is terminating one other human being!
There are dangers of issues for mom throughout & after abortions
Girls don’t cry for yrs mourning their knowledge enamel. pic.twitter.com/PG0DzwRPUr

— 𝕁𝕖𝕟𝕟𝕚𝕗𝕖𝕣🔱🇺🇸🔱 Religion not concern! (@GodLovesUSA1) March 5, 2020

“Abortions are one of many most secure procedures you would do on an outpatient foundation, safer than doing an endoscopy or doing a knowledge enamel extraction,” stated Speier.

In fact, that’s not true. It solely applies if you happen to’re keen to utterly overlook the truth that neither an endoscopy nor knowledge enamel extraction entails the loss of life of a child.